Skip to Navigation

Comprehensive care: the role of France

Within the framework of the European Program for Action to Confront HIV/AIDS, Malaria and Tuberculosis, France, which has the benefit of considerable experience in the area of comprehensive care, would like to form a European action team to work on this topic, with the aim of drawing up a European Handbook for Comprehensive Care.

Four preliminary meetings have been held: on 29th April 2009 at the French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs (Ministère des Affaires étrangères et Européennes - MAEE), on 3rd June during the ESTHER Day, on 18th June (during the Solidays Festival), and on 3rd July, on both occasions at the French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs. These meetings served to clarify the general project and establish the main concerns. The aim of this concept paper is to present the overall project and its priorities, and each party is invited to modify it, or add or highlight the issues which he considers to be important. 

1 - Context

The European Program for Action to Confront HIV/AIDS, Malaria and Tuberculosis by external actions (2007-2011), adopted by the Council of the EU in 2005, proposes a collective Community action with the aim of making up the financing shortfall to meet the sixth Millennium Development Goal (MDG). It consists in supporting programs to combat the three major pandemics run by developing and middle-income countries, as well as action at international level in areas where the EU can provide added value.

At national level, the main challenge is to develop political dialogue, capacities for action and financial resources. The particular aims of the program at regional and global level are: developing access to medication, regulatory capacities, human resources in the health sector, research and new intervention tools.

The 2009 report of the Commission on the advancement of the Action Program highlights the progress made since its launch, but calls for greater efforts on the part of the members at regional and global level. It emphasises the promotion of human rights and parity between the sexes, the reinforcement of the health systems, dialogue with partner countries, increased public development assistance and access to medication.

The report also proposes a division of labour at European level in the priority sectors in order to develop a more efficient political dialogue, to share expertise and coordinate action means, and to better collaborate with people affected by the pandemics, as well as with civil society and international organizations.

This division of labour will take place through the putting into place of EU Action Teams. Each team will be run by a Member State and will be responsible for one of the priority topics of the Action Program. Its role will be to reflect on ways of improving the implementation of Action Program recommendations.

Each team will be made up of Member States, organizations of civil society, public-private partnerships and international organizations. The countries with the responsibility of heading the teams will be entrusted with the implementation and coordination of these teams.

The Member States who have expressed an interest in forming and directing action teams are The Netherlands (HIV/AIDS and human rights), the United Kingdom (prevention of HIV/AIDS), Germany (HIV/AIDS and gender issues) and France (comprehensive care). The Commission has expressed interest in heading a team on the access to affordable medicine. It will also be in charge of coordinating the work of the different action teams, thus preventing any overlap on the part of the various teams.

A meeting on the European action teams, attended by France and the Netherlands, was held on 2nd June 2009 at the Commission in order to discuss the mandate and the aims of the action teams, the role of the member countries, the working methods and the involvement of civil society.

The work of the action team on comprehensive care will allow us to draw up recommendations, which will be gathered in a European "Handbook" of comprehensive care. The aim of this handbook will be not only to launch an international reflection on comprehensive care, but to act as a reference guide for the different care players, both at national level and in a perspective of cooperation between European countries in the combat against the three epidemics. Other possibilities can also be envisaged, such as the implementation of a European training course in the area of comprehensive care.

2 - The French experience

As France has a considerable amount of experience in comprehensive care, it would seem logical that she proposes to coordinate a European action team on this topic. France is one of the Europe countries most affected by HIV/AIDS, and has provided a quality reaction since the beginning of the pandemic.

The combat against the illness does not just involve providing medication, but should also take into account the social, cultural, economic and legal implications of the illness, in order to ensure that the rights of sufferers are respected. Particular attention should be given to vulnerable people and victims of discrimination, in particular, women and sexual minorities.

In order to improve this comprehensive care, the pooling of expertise between the different partners is essential. The programs supported by France are thus the result of a close collaboration between different parties: governments, community leaders, associations of people living with HIV/AIDS, socio-health players, etc... Such cooperation brings a more global approach to the problem and therefore more efficient efforts to combat the illness.

This experience in the area of comprehensive care is based both on actions at national level, and multilateral and bilateral collaboration at international level.

At national level, the objective of the COREVIH (Comités de coordination régionale de la lutte contre le VIH - Regional Coordination Committees for the combat against HIV) is to favour the comprehensive care of people living with HIV. Their particular structure facilitates contact between the hospital and the external environment, between the health and social sectors, and between patient associations and patient support. They have three missions: the coordination of players involved in the fight against HIV, the collection and analysis of medical-epidemiological data and the contribution to the improvement, evaluation and harmonization of professional practices. So, in the aspect of the combat against HIV/AIDS (and also tuberculosis) at national level, there is a major coordination effort between specialized hospital teams, general practitioners of patients, and associations involving the patient and those close to him.

The French associations also play an important role. The aim of the association Sidaction, for example, is the collection and distribution of funds between research programs, patient care and the prevention of the epidemic, both in France and internationally. AIDES was created in 1984 with the aim of bringing together people directly or indirectly affected by HIV/AIDS to help them deal with the illness. Several associations are regrouped in the Coalition PLUS forming a common structure to promote a collective Community approach in the combat against HIV/AIDS.

France, conscious of the role played by the associations in the combat against VIH/AIDS, supported the FSP program "Support for civil society for access to anti-retroviral treatment of HIV/AIDS in the developing countries". This project supported the multi-association ELSA platform (Ensemble pour Lutter contre le Sida en Afrique - Together, let's fight AIDS in Africa), allowing it to reinforce its action for the benefit of associations of southern countries. The associations that benefit from the ELSA project are mainly African partners, representing 90 associations in 27 countries.

At international level, the promotion of comprehensive care takes the form of strong support of multilateral and bilateral players.

Concerning multilateral action, France plays an essential role in the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which encourages the involvement of civil society in the combat against the three illnesses, takes into account the specificities linked to gender and to sexual minorities exposed to HIV/AIDS and finances the reinforcement of health systems. France is also very involved in the actions of UNAIDS, such as campaigns for the free circulation of people living with HIV/AIDS, and in those of other multilateral organizations which promote comprehensive patient care, such as the IUATLD (International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease) or Stop TB or the Roll Back Malaria (RBM) Partnership.

As for bilateral action, the Mission for Relations with Civil Society carries out numerous actions aimed at reinforcing the capacities of southern organizations: networking arrangements, campaigning, combat against discrimination, etc... Partnerships have also been developed with private players in order to combat HIV/AIDS, such as the project "PME sans sida" (AIDS-free small and medium-sized companies) on the Ivory Coast, or a program of reinforcement of the combat against HIV in the mining companies of Guinea. The French Development Agency (Agence Française de Développement - AFD) supports notably the association Partenaires contre le sida (Partners Against AIDS), which aims at reinforcing the capacities of players of the private sector of developing countries, through the provision of high-quality technical expertise.

Also the ESTHER Public Interest Group (Ensemble pour une Solidarité Thérapeutique Hospitalière en Réseau - Network for Therapeutic Solidarity in Hospitals) has the mission of supporting partnerships that enable a sustainable interconnection of patient care around hospitals and social networks. The ESTHER European Alliance is made up of ten countries, and aims at favouring networking between health professionals and associations of the European region in order to promote efficient comprehensive care. Through ESTHER, partnerships have been developed with 18 countries of Africa and Southeast Asia.

3 - Comprehensive care and European collaboration

During the consultation of the involved parties of the European Action Program in Brussels and Dakar in November-December 2008, the participants stressed the necessity of promoting comprehensive care of those suffering from HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis. The emphasis on the access to medication should not reduce the need for comprehensive care of patients and their families.

This comprehensive care centred on the person should notably be centred on the family and the community of the patient, and include psychological support, clinical care, economic and social support, human rights, as well as the support of families and communities affected by the pandemics.

The involved parties also emphasized the necessity of promoting integrated approaches to combat co-infections such as AIDS-tuberculosis. The important thing is to ensure continuity of care and patient support, thanks to improved coordination between public and private health services, and with programs of home care.

A certain number of recommendations were made by the involved parties in the framework of the Action Program:
- to promote comprehensive care through the elaboration of directives and sharing of expertise with the partner countries
- to acknowledge the importance and contribution of acquired experience
- to implement policies against HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis in the workplace, to promote the prevention of illnesses among the staff, and allow the infected persons to benefit from programs of social security and employment
- to support research capacities in partner countries to gather data on the illnesses and distribute information on the good practices to be followed
- to ensure technical support, financing and reinforcement of the capacities for the implementation of comprehensive care policies, including the "care of the carers", the transfers of funds, the social security programs for the most vulnerable, as well as assistance to patient networks and to community-based organizations.
- to engage in dialogue on ways of improving the school attendance of children affected by HIV/AIDS, to support the initiatives aiming at improving literacy of people on medication, to provide technical support and advice to improve the access of sufferers to the legal resources of their country.

The creation of a European work team in the framework of the Action Program offers the possibility to continue and deepen the European collaboration implemented in the context of comprehensive care.

Several European NGOs are also very involved in the promotion of comprehensive care, such as the GNP+ (Global Network of People living with HIV/AIDS), based in the Netherlands, or also the United Kingdom-based International HIV/AIDS Alliance, the largest EU organization for the combat against HIV/AIDS, aimed at mobilizing and reinforcing the communities to empower them in their combat against HIV/AIDS. Also, the work group on the HIV/AIDS, CONCORD, which is a group of European NGOs working in the area of HIV/AIDS and of development, could play an important role in supporting the European team project.

The approaches made to these different European players, as well as the collaboration with other EU countries interested by the topic of patient care, will allow the implementation of truly common strategies in the area of comprehensive care.

4 - Priorities of the action team

Four preliminary meetings were held, bringing together experts and representatives of the civil society: on 29th April 2009 at the French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs, on 3rd June 2009 during the ESTHER Day at the European Hospital Georges Pompidou, on 18th June at the French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs with numerous associations of the southern countries during the Solidays Festival, and on 3rd July also at the French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs. These meetings allowed us to specify the general framework of the project and to establish the main issues on which the European action team should focus. For reasons of clarity, these main topics were also divided into major categories. The European comprehensive care handbook is therefore intended to deal essentially with the following concerns:

a - Clinical aspects

  • multi-disciplinary care
  • care quality
  • quality prevention (primary and secondary) 
  • paediatrics 
  • nutrition
  • prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMCT)
  • quality of the evaluation and follow up
  • evaluation and modernisation of laboratories in sites where diagnosis are carried out, not only of HIV (viral infection), but also of all associated infections, in particular tuberculosis. This would contribute greatly to the reinforcement of local capacities in the area of health, with a major short-term interest for diagnosis and follow up of the three pandemics, and a long-term interest for the performance of diagnostic tools in the more global context of health in the southern countries.
  • benefits of acquired experience
  • research

b - Economic, social and psychosocial aspects 

  • reception, information and guidance of patients
  • psychosocial accompaniment 
  • psychological care
  • professional training
  • reinforcement of health systems
  • skills reinforcement
  • support of national programs, based on existing structures
  • multi-sectoral cooperation 
  • putting into place of areas of exchange
  • networking, in particular between public and private hospitals and care centres, starting with civil society and people infected and/or affected by HIV. In this way, the development of platforms, such as the Country Coordination Mechanisms, supported by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, or health platforms between hospitals and associations accompanied by ESTHER, could facilitate the access to care and improvement of the quality of services.
  • benefits of acquired experience
  • research

c - Legislation and Human Rights

  • respect of patients' rights
  • access to care
  • combat against discrimination
  • care of vulnerable persons
  • mediation between patients and public powers
  • political will
  • involvement of territorial collectivities
  • benefits of acquired experience
  • research

d - Family and community

  • community mobilization 
  • role of associations
  • care of orphansbenefits of acquired experience
  • research

This list is not definitive and all interested parties are free to add or modify topics. Each party is also invited to contribute on the topics related to his activity and his experience. This may deal with the importance that should be given to these topics, the good practices to promote, or concrete examples of positive or negative experiences in the area of comprehensive care, etc...

Numerous publications on the topic of the comprehensive care already exist at international level, and the aim of the European handbook is not to redo that what has already been done. This is why the application of acquired experience can constitute a real added value for this handbook, so the gathering of the experiences of all parties in the area of comprehensive care is a key point.

Also, if this turns out to be relevant, the handbook should aim to give equal importance to each of the three pandemics.

5 - Action plan

Those interested in this initiative may modify this concept paper from now on to specify or include the elements that they consider to be the most important. The first contributions to the concept paper are presented below. The document is on line on the site vih.org in French, English and Spanish, and each party can contribute through the site or by sending an email to Marie Ahouanto.

At the end of Summer 2009, the concept paper will be presented to the European Commission in order to set out the project to be undertaken by France. Following validation of this document by the Commission, the other members of the EU interested in the topic of comprehensive care will be able to participate in the work of the European team headed by France. At least two other European countries will have to be involved in order to form an action team. At present, Spain could be interested by this project and the Spanish presidency of the EU in 2010 could be a way of promoting the initiative.

The players already consulted, as well as the persons interested by this project, are invited to also approach their networks, in order to encourage participation of representatives of civil society and of experts from other countries in the reflection. The associations can also encourage other countries to participate in the European action team.

This process should conclude, at the end of 2009 or the beginning of 2010, in a first meeting of the entire European action team, which will include Member States, experts and organizations of North and South. The work of this action team will then allow the elaboration of a European handbook of comprehensive care, aimed at both European players and players from the southern countries.

Les réactions

Contribution of Gilles Brücker (ESTHER Public Interest Group)

1) The comprehensive care of people living with HIV is the very aim of ESTHER, a goal reflected in the reinforcement of the capacities of our partner countries. With its seven years of experience, ESTHER is now active in 18 countries. It mobilises over 60 hospital teams, composed of staff from French hospitals twinned with hospitals of southern countries, and supports 170 associations of southern countries in 23 associative collectives. This experience can therefore be used for the benefit of the envisaged handbook.

2) Comprehensive care includes access to diagnosis, medical follow up, anti-retroviral treatment, treatment of opportunistic infections and co-infections (notably tuberculosis) and psychological and social care of sufferers.

3) The essential elements of this care include the identification of the most exposed and vulnerable groups (unknown or forgotten), in particular, orphans and vulnerable children, transsexuals, prisoners, intravenous drug abusers.

4)Comprehensive care should also target the deliberately excluded and most stigmatised groups (homosexuals). Care of these groups, and attention to their exposure risks, is also a way of recognising social rights.

5) The key factors of a care handbook include: The effort to reduce care inequalities with regard to:
- Economic criteria: precarity, poverty, free provision of indispensable treatments and of necessary laboratory tests.
- Geographical criteria: wide decentralisation with definition of an education guidance or tutorial system through reference centres, and delegation of tasks in the framework of human resources management.

6) The definition of follow up indicators, and support of information systems consequently put into place should be integrated into the care system in order to be able to evaluate the quality of activities.

7) Operational research programs should contribute to this analysis of the feasibility of programs and actions and contribute to more efficient strategies, keeping in mind the numerous financial restrictions in the face of growing needs.

Contribution of Fabrice Clouzeau (Sida Info Service)

The implementation of a national telephone service, Sida Info Service, in 1990 represented a further contribution to the experience of France in this domain.

The telephone is an excellent means of establishing a relation with the citizens in the combat against HIV/AIDS. The precise information, high-quality accompaniment, empowerment of users, guidance, support and observatory missions of Sida Info Service are all part of a global approach to the Health of the individual, with respect to primary, secondary or tertiary prevention. The contribution of the New Information and Communication Technologies (NICT) supports the idea of comprehensive care of the person, by offering services adapted to the communication means and techniques employed by the users. Whether in a public or community approach, the remote aspect of the relation is part of a very strong ethical framework and a set of shared values, such as respect, listening capacity, a non-judgmental attitude towards the caller and consideration of the callers circumstances in both an individual and a global context.

The remote relationship also contributes to the aims of Public Health and social accompaniment, and communicates the Policies of Prevention and Health Education: you only have to dial a number to get immediate access to scientifically validated information, support and advice on various options. Because this relationship is anonymous (or involves an Internet pseudonym) and confidential, callers can feel free to ask all sorts of questions.

Over time, the remote assistance relationship has become completely complementary to traditional social, psychological and medical measures.

On account of its expertise in the remote relationship in the area of HIV/AIDS infection, hepatitis, Sexually Transmissible Infections, contraception and abortion, Sida Info Service is requested to provide methodological and logistic support in the implementation of telephone lines dedicated to these topics in the southern countries.

SIS is internationally recognized as a model structure for the transfer of engineering skills and remote assistance practices and know-how towards developing countries. The mobile phone is a key tool of information, prevention and guidance. The action of the association consists in supporting the creation of national measures, or the reinforcement of existing ones, which have an important function in the reinforcement and expansion of the national response to HIV/AIDS.

SIS reinforce the capacities of partner associations through:
- Research of financing;
- Coordination training;
- Training of councillors (initial or follow up);
- IT and telephone networks;
- Implementation of tools for evaluation and restoration of calls; including partners in the network (which now exist between southern countries);
- Assistance in communication programs.

Remote (telephone and internet) assistance, because it is anonymous, confidential and free-of charge, offers a protected environment where callers can speak freely in societies where AIDS is still taboo. SIS is also in charge of the training of psychosocial consultants who participate in ESTHER programs in seven countries. It is a member of the ELSA platform.

The perverse effects of diagnosis are also demonstrated by the experiences in the framework of the ESTHER Psychosocial Councillors training program. Encouragement towards diagnosis is primordial in the combat against HIV/AIDS. We are all agreed on the importance of early diagnosis, and on the consequences of a late diagnosis in terms of care. However, the revelation of HIV seropositivity is frequently followed by family, community or social exclusion. This is particularly true for women who are proposed a diagnosis during pregnancy. The institution of marriage often implies submission to the husband. The simple fact of accepting a diagnosis without the agreement of the husband is a source of conflict, which a positive diagnosis only reinforces. The woman risks being driven out onto the street, sometimes along with her children. If she doesn’t receive financial and psychological support from her family, which is unfortunately often the case, she will have to find food and dwelling. Taking care of herself and her health becomes a luxury. Comprehensive care involves supporting social programs to assist people who agree to take a test. So, encouragement towards diagnostic testing, an essential step in the combat against the HIV Pandemic, is confronted with even more obstacles.

Another aspect of the action of the ESTHER program is the development of skills of the Psychosocial Councillors, who although not carers, participate fully in the care process. They constitute an essential link with the care team, both in their accompaniment of people living with HIV in their place of care (explanation of the point of treatments, follow up, observance) and in their role in information, prevention and mediation in the community. They also provide valuable help in all situations requiring interventions of the existing social system.

Contribution of Denis da Conceiçao Courpotin

1) To help the countries to modernise the national programs: normative documents, for example, diagnosis and early treatment of children born of HIV positive mothers.
2) To reinforce information programs of the general public: for example, the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMCT) with information, education, and communication (IEC) through associatives, radio and television.
3) The specificity of adolescents confronted with chronic illnesses.
4) The universal access of women and children to (free) care: the gender issue
5) To help countries decide on the location of care centres and especially of the biological technical installations.

Professional reinsertion of patients marginalized by the illness.

Contribution of Alice Desclaux (IRD, Dakar)

(L'Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) is the Institute of Research for the Development)

Concerning comprehensive care and research, the proposals should be based on the results of operational research which allowed us to adjust the international biomedical care recommendations to each care context: limited resources, decentralisation, pluralist care offer, patients on long-term anti-retroviral treatment. A knowledge of social, cultural and economic contexts is indispensable, so that the care handbook can respond to the effective needs on the ground in a variety of local situations, and can be adapted, an essential condition for reasons of practicality. Finally, the care handbook should include the specific elements allowing it to be adapted to particular populations. Effectively, while the needs of “vulnerable populations” may be subject to a specific reflection concerning prevention, this is rarely the case for care.

The Institute of Research for the Development has carried out several programs on these aspects of AIDS, in collaboration with the sites of the ANRS (French National Agency for AIDS and Viral Hepatitis Research), Sidaction and the ministry for research (work of the UMR 145). The approach in this area is based on collaboration with the ANRS sites, notably the CRCF (Regional centre of research and training on the care of HIV and associated illnesses) of the Fann Hospital, which carries out application-orientated and multi-disciplinary research. The aims of these efforts are or were:
- To define the therapeutic protocols adapted to the context of limited resources (Triomune trial, second line treatment trials 2LADY) in order to propose feasible strategies.
- To specify the needs in comprehensive care of patients on anti-retroviral treatment for ten years or more (ANRS 1215, CRCF Dakar), in order to propose the context of a bio-clinical, psychological or social follow up, adapted to patients on long-term treatments.
- To know the offer and the therapeutic choices of patients in the areas of alternative and “neo-traditional” treatment in Africa (ANRS and Sidaction, Senegal study, Burkina Faso, Benin) in order to draw up appropriate recommendations.
- To understand the reasons for insufficient availability of care for men (as opposed to women) in relation to HIV (Burkina Faso, Cameroon), in order to reduce the inequalities of gender and facilitate HIV management in couples.
- To understand how the different roles of the women (as mothers, partners, and individuals) concerned by HIV interconnect in order to determine their needs (there is a related issue of Social Science and Medicine awaiting publication: Women, Mothers and HIV/AIDS care in resource-poor settings).
- To know the social dimensions and the links to care systems which determine the management of procreation and care of young children in the context of HIV (research underway in Dakar, Yaoundé and Bobo-Dioulasso), in order to organise “family care”
- To know new forms of stigmatisation towards AIDS and “socially vulnerable” people (homosexuals, sex workers, imprisoned people, etc...) and their effects on care.

The elaboration of recommendations on these areas can draw on a certain number of already existing resources.

Contribution of Bernard Larouzé (INSERM)

(Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale – French national institute of health and medical research (Inserm) – Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) - Mixed Research Unit 707)

The documents received by us deal for the most part with HIV, although the project is intended to deal with tuberculosis (TB), malaria and HIV. This illustrates to what extent AIDS has become THE problem of public health, with the risk of overshadowing other major problems. In a global approach, at least a common approach towards TB and HIV would be desirable. Everyone knows that in several countries two programs (TB and HIV) co-exist more than they collaborate despite the immediate links with the epidemiological and clinical aspects of these two infections. The difficulty is to translate this closeness at operational level.
The dimension “public policies” of this comprehensive care is not very obvious in the texts sent to us. The conception of a “global” approach requires analysis from a political science point of view: who are the present and potential players of what we call comprehensive care? Which are the institutions concerned (public organizations or NGOs)? How do they cooperate in formal and informal fashion? How do we optimise this cooperation?

As it is the southern countries that are particularly concerned by these issues, it is inconceivable not to involve these countries. The recommended measures should not again come from the northern countries and their so-called experts. This is even more important in light of the fact that there is a great heterogeneity of health systems from one country to another, and even sometimes within the same country. As the Brazilian approach showed in the area of AIDS, the challenge is to encourage peripheral structures to elaborate themselves plans adapted to local situations and potential events. This involvement does not necessarily require meetings and seminars, which are often very formal, but a consultation based on some elements of guidance.

Contribution of Guillaume Le Loup (INSERM, Hospital Tenon, Paris

(Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale – French national institute of health and medical research (Inserm) – Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) - Mixed Research Unit S 707 and Hospital Tenon, Paris public hospital)

One of the aspects limiting the comprehensive care of the patient is the fragility, or even absence, of a care and follow up path that associates in a coherent and continuous way the different health services that intervene in care.

A simple example is that of patients being cared for in a unit of primary care who require, because of the state of their health, urgent hospitalisation in a more complex centre (level 3). The transfer from one establishment to another must be organized, if there is no ambulance, by the patients themselves or their family, if they have one, and at their expense, which is often impossible.

In general, the co-operation between the different levels of complexity of the health system and between programs (HIV, tuberculosis, malaria) is often limited and has a direct effect on the care path of the patient, despite the fact that the importance of these co-diseases, in particular of the co-infections (TB-HIV, malaria-HIV) is recognized.

As well as the coordination of health players, there is also the problem of coherence of the strategies implemented by different programs and how to harmonise them. The care of the pregnant woman (diagnosis of possible pregnancy complications, prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV and syphilis; intermittent preventative treatment of malaria) and that of the baby (vaccinations, intermittent preventative treatment of malaria, nutrition) show whether the health players are capable of constructing a care path ensuring global, preventative and curative care, integrated into the treatment management and within the community.

The problems that arise obviously go beyond the classical but simplistic debate between the vertical, centralized, specific program of an illness, and a decentralized, horizontal, integrated health system. To answer these questions, approaches in terms of analysis of public policy and of the sociology of organizations, focusing on the mobilization mechanics of health players and their cooperation tools, provide useful information, as we recently tried to show in the case of Brazil.

Contribution of Francoise Linard (Psychiatric Department, Tenon)

Although we obviously approve of the concept of comprehensive care, its content still has to be defined.

I therefore propose that we ask ourselves about the terminology used, in particular the term “psychosocial”. This term comprises two aspects: “psycho” and “social”. Psychiatrists have noticed in the areas of care and personnel training, that the vague nature of the concept is the cause of significant care difficulties: disorders (depression, anxiety, suicidal ideas, and manic states) are not often diagnosed. They are not always differentiated from the consequences of somatic conditions (anorexia, asthenia), or from the side effects of certain treatments (depressive state, sleep disorders).

Care is often superficial, the treatments (when available) are not always prescribed and knowledge of psychotherapeutic techniques is often lacking.

If we don’t want the “psychiatric” aspect of care to be restricted to simple support and comfort (although certainly necessary), patients must have the right to treatments and personnel must have access to training.

Contribution of Johanna Spreeuwenberg (Nertherlands)

The WHO HIV/AIDS Department, in December 2008, published a reference book “Priority interventions: HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment and care in the health sector «(that) defines the
essential interventions the health sector should deliver, and provides key references and links to webbased resources. WHO launched an initial version of the document in August 2008, at the global
AIDS conference in Mexico City. This updated report, published online and as a CD-ROM, will be
further adapted as recommendations evolve. It offers WHO’s best attempt to assemble and package
normative advice for the health sector on the essential response to HIV/AIDS. We hope it will prove
useful for all people who work in the health sector as they confront the realities of HIV/AIDS throughout the world».

This book is the richest source of guidance on the subject of comprehensive care (and prevention) that I know and I warmly recommend it to the EU Action Team on Comprehensive Care.

Comprehensive Care

Good quality comprehensive care is definitely needed and aimed for by all stakeholders. However the handbook should, in the light of a health worker shortage, try to elaborate also on examples on how to recruit and retain appropriate personnel especially for rural places and about possibly different cadres of health workers needed? and who is going to supervise and support them. There is a risk to overwhelm the existing human resources with an add on to their tasks if comprehensive care fails to carefully define the interface between public or private health care services and existing capacities of families and communities in order to complement each other activities.